AI Litigation | State AI Law Illinois’ BIPA Privacy Law Now Determines What AI Evidence Courts Will Accept ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025November 3, 2025
Legal Ethics The Invisible Breach: How Shadow AI is Slipping Into Law Firm Workflows ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025November 7, 2025
AI Litigation Predictive Analytics in Litigation: When Algorithms Calculate Your Odds of Winning ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025October 31, 2025
AI Litigation | State AI Law Guiding Without Advising: How State Courts Are Testing AI for Pro Se Assistance ByJon Dykstra October 30, 2025October 30, 2025
Legal Ethics Feeding the Machine: Are Law Firms Using Client Data to Train AI Without Permission? ByJon Dykstra October 30, 2025October 30, 2025
Legal Ethics | Judicial AI Perspectives Delegating Justice: The Human Limits of Algorithmic Law ByJon Dykstra October 30, 2025October 30, 2025
Legal Ethics | State AI Law New Jersey Building the Playbook for AI-Written Briefs Through a Layered Approach ByJon Dykstra October 29, 2025October 29, 2025
AI Law News | State AI Law California Becomes First State to Mandate AI Transparency in Police Reports ByJon Dykstra October 29, 2025November 5, 2025
AI Law News CBA’s AI Ethics Toolkit Recasts Professional Duties for the Algorithmic Era ByJon Dykstra October 28, 2025October 30, 2025
AI Law News Research Suggests Legal AI’s Efficiency Gains Undermined by Verification Costs ByJon Dykstra October 28, 2025November 4, 2025
Legal Ethics | State AI Law How Utah Became a Laboratory for AI-Driven Legal Innovation ByJon Dykstra October 28, 2025October 28, 2025
AI Litigation | Judicial AI Perspectives Algorithmic Sentencing Gains Ground in Criminal Courts ByJon Dykstra October 27, 2025November 3, 2025
