AI Litigation Berkeley Law Study Examines How AI Can Narrow the Justice Gap Thanks to Efficiency Gains ByJon Dykstra November 7, 2025November 7, 2025
AI Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Courts Split Over Generative AI Copyright Claims ByJon Dykstra November 6, 2025November 6, 2025
AI Litigation | Judicial AI Perspectives Judges Grapple with Algorithms That Test the First Amendment ByJon Dykstra November 6, 2025November 7, 2025
AI Litigation From Transparency to Proof: How Global Standards Are Redefining Legal AI Accountability ByJon Dykstra November 4, 2025November 4, 2025
AI Litigation AI Evidence on Trial: When Algorithms Contradict Forensic Experts ByJon Dykstra November 3, 2025November 3, 2025
AI Litigation | State AI Law Illinois’ BIPA Privacy Law Now Determines What AI Evidence Courts Will Accept ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025November 3, 2025
AI Litigation Predictive Analytics in Litigation: When Algorithms Calculate Your Odds of Winning ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025October 31, 2025
AI Litigation | State AI Law Guiding Without Advising: How State Courts Are Testing AI for Pro Se Assistance ByJon Dykstra October 30, 2025October 30, 2025
AI Litigation | Judicial AI Perspectives Algorithmic Sentencing Gains Ground in Criminal Courts ByJon Dykstra October 27, 2025November 3, 2025
AI Litigation Can Prosecutors Constitutionally Outsource Charging Decisions to Algorithms? ByJon Dykstra October 24, 2025October 24, 2025
AI Litigation Opening the Black Box and Making the Case for Explainable AI ByJon Dykstra October 22, 2025October 24, 2025
AI Litigation Self-Representation Meets AI: Promise, Peril, and Professional Oversight ByJon Dykstra October 21, 2025November 7, 2025
