AI Litigation Clients Tighten AI Terms That Redefine Outside Counsel Compliance ByJon Dykstra January 13, 2026January 13, 2026
Legal Ethics | AI Practice Management Generative AI Turns the Billable Hour into a Credibility Test ByJon Dykstra January 12, 2026January 12, 2026
AI Practice Management | AI Law News Training-Data Disclosure Pages Are Now Regulated Deliverables Under California’s AB 2013 ByJon Dykstra January 9, 2026January 9, 2026
AI Practice Management How to Train Legal Teams to Catch Hallucinated Citations Before Filing ByJon Dykstra January 7, 2026January 9, 2026
AI Litigation | Judicial AI Perspectives Courts Begin Testing AI Language Models as Evidence of Contractual Meaning ByJon Dykstra November 28, 2025December 9, 2025
Legal Ethics Bar Regulators Deploy AI to Police Attorney Misconduct ByJon Dykstra November 12, 2025November 12, 2025
AI Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Courts Split Over Generative AI Copyright Claims ByJon Dykstra November 6, 2025November 17, 2025
Legal Ethics The Invisible Breach: How Shadow AI is Slipping Into Law Firm Workflows ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025December 8, 2025
Legal Ethics Feeding the Machine: Are Law Firms Using Client Data to Train AI Without Permission? ByJon Dykstra October 30, 2025November 10, 2025
Legal Ethics | State AI Law New Jersey Building the Playbook for AI-Written Briefs Through a Layered Approach ByJon Dykstra October 29, 2025November 12, 2025
AI Law News | State AI Law California Becomes First State to Mandate AI Transparency in Police Reports ByJon Dykstra October 29, 2025January 14, 2026
AI Law News CBA’s AI Ethics Toolkit Recasts Professional Duties for the Algorithmic Era ByJon Dykstra October 28, 2025October 30, 2025
