AI Litigation | Judicial AI Perspectives Courts Begin Testing AI Language Models as Evidence of Contractual Meaning ByJon Dykstra November 28, 2025December 9, 2025
Legal Ethics Bar Regulators Deploy AI to Police Attorney Misconduct ByJon Dykstra November 12, 2025November 12, 2025
AI Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Courts Split Over Generative AI Copyright Claims ByJon Dykstra November 6, 2025November 17, 2025
Legal Ethics The Invisible Breach: How Shadow AI is Slipping Into Law Firm Workflows ByJon Dykstra October 31, 2025December 8, 2025
Legal Ethics Feeding the Machine: Are Law Firms Using Client Data to Train AI Without Permission? ByJon Dykstra October 30, 2025November 10, 2025
Legal Ethics | State AI Law New Jersey Building the Playbook for AI-Written Briefs Through a Layered Approach ByJon Dykstra October 29, 2025November 12, 2025
AI Law News | State AI Law California Becomes First State to Mandate AI Transparency in Police Reports ByJon Dykstra October 29, 2025November 5, 2025
AI Law News CBA’s AI Ethics Toolkit Recasts Professional Duties for the Algorithmic Era ByJon Dykstra October 28, 2025October 30, 2025
AI Law News Research Suggests Legal AI’s Efficiency Gains Undermined by Verification Costs ByJon Dykstra October 28, 2025November 4, 2025
AI Practice Management When Rules Meet Reason: How Hybrid AI Could Save Legal Tech from Itself ByJon Dykstra October 27, 2025December 3, 2025
Legal Ethics Beyond Human Hands: The Uncertain Copyright of AI-Drafted Law ByJon Dykstra October 24, 2025November 11, 2025
Judicial AI Perspectives | State AI Law Georgia’s AI Framework: A Three-Year Strategy to Transform the Courts ByJon Dykstra October 24, 2025October 30, 2025
